Game of the Decade: 2010-2019 Contest Analysis Crew - Part 3
GameFAQs Contests
- Master Moltar (38)
- Board List
- Topic List
- Track Topic
- Topic Closed
transience posted... I hope you guys are right! 62% on RE7 seems really bad, especially if we're looking at RE2 coming up soon. I still took ME2 just because of the respect factor. I think it's fine. It wasn't great, but like I said, I don't think ME2 really has anything to worry about until round 4. (edited 4/12/2020 10:17:09 AM) |
Round 2 – Borderlands 2 vs. Horizon Zero Dawn Moltar’s Analysis Borderlands 2 Round 1 – 59.10% vs. Bloodstained: Ritual of the Night Horizon Zero Dawn Round 1 – 80.93% vs. Fortnite hey it’s my one guru upset man am i boring As much as I want to say Horizon’s got this thanks to its 80% blowout against Fortnite, I can’t. Fortnite was fated to be very weak here, and I’m sure anti-votes for it also helped play a part as to why it looked great. What I can say is that Borderlands didn’t look all that hot in its first round match, as Bloodstained isn’t super weak, but I wouldn’t say its in the midcard either. Borderlands also has never looked all that impressive in the past as well, and a big showing in round 1 would have made me give it a shot here. But nope, still feel good about Horizon. Borderlands shouldn’t do too badly, but Horizon, inflated blowout and all, looked straight up stronger in its previous match. That’s usually a good sign about trying to predict these later round matches. Moltar’s Bracket: Horizon Zero Dawn Moltar’s Prediction: Horizon Zero Dawn – 57% ____________________________________________________________________________ transience’s Analysis Horizon definitely had the better result at first glance. It really butchered Fortnite. But as we've seen since then, a lot of games are going 80%+ against well-known games that are far outside of our wheelhouse. Remember Minecraft tripling Dota 2? It's not like Minecraft is suddenly a powerhouse here! Borderlands 2 didn't start out well but ended up getting a full 59% against Bloodstained, which isn't amazing or anything but probably isn't awful. This feels more like a round 1 match because neither game feels properly tested. Maybe that will become the norm in round 2 because it's hard to say much about unknown games without much strength. I'm going to side with Borderlands 2 here because I trust that name more than I do Horizon's, and because Horizon's result means literally nothing. I think half the indie games here we accuse of being "trash" would have beaten Fortnite on principle. transience's prediction: Borderlands 2 with 53.13% ____________________________________________________________________________ Leonhart’s Analysis I think my feelings on Borderlands 2 are pretty clear at this point. It’s the most fraudulent Game of the Year winner of the past decade, but it did manage to get a nice win in round 1, reaching almost 60% against Bloodstained. Horizon Zero Dawn demolished Fortnite, but I’d chalk that up more to Fortnite’s weakness than anything else. It would’ve gotten clobbered by just about anything. However, we’ve seen that the 2017 GOTY field was legit. We’ve seen Breath of the Wild, Mario Odyssey, Persona 5, Cuphead, Hollow Knight, and NieR Automata put up big wins so far. We saw RE7 overperform on ME2, Xenoblade 2 put a scare into Batman, and Nioh knocked out Binding of Isaac, and those were games that didn’t put up big percentages in their GOTY polls. 2017 was just a really strong year for video games, and I think that means good things for Horizon here. We’ll see the difference between the strongest year this decade and the weakest one in this match. Leonhart’s Vote: Horizon Zero Dawn Leonhart’s Prediction: Horizon Zero Dawn with 55.44% ____________________________________________________________________________ Kleenex’s Analysis I’m still not completely convinced of Horizon's strength, but I think Borderlands is dead in the water. There’s only so strong Bloodstained can actually be, and Horizon breaking 80% - even against something like Fortnight - is still way better than what Borderlands was able to offer up last round. Kleenex’s Prediction: Horizon: Zero Dawn with 58.50% ____________________________________________________________________________ Guest’s Analysis – Kotetsu534 We've finally made it through (most) of the complete fodder to the promised land of Round 2, where we get some interesting matchups between games this site might actually care about a little. This 4-seed v 5-seed match is interesting in that it pairs a game that was a big thing 8 years ago that now looks very much of its time (it didn't take itself at all seriously and Wikipedia tells me there was some sexism controversy surrounding a "girlfriend" skill three) up against a game that's much more recent, will likely be followed up by a big budget sequel, and seems to fit the zeitgeist (it features a spunky female lead and has a much more serious tone). Judging by Borderlands 2's laboured efforts against Bloodstained in R1, our 2012 GOTY has seen better days. Horizon still scares me a little - I'm naturally sceptical of PS4 exclusives that don't carry a brand name like "God of War" or "Metal Gear Solid". Still it's been solid in every poll it's showed up in - held up to Persona and beat out Nier: Automata in 2017, and mericilessly crushed Fortnite in R1. It should score a nice easy win for recent games here, probably around 60/40. If it goes much higher, watch out ME2! Horizon Zero Dawn - 61.4% ____________________________________________________________________________ Crew Consensus: Horizon is the Crew favorite, but transience is backing Borderlands. Moltar Status: hype Contest Analysis Crew Archives: http://thecrew.speedrunwiki.com/ |
Thanks for taking one for the team transience |
Horizon might put a scare into ME2, but based on how weak Aloy was in 2018 I doubt it. "Nothing I could do!" -Darksydephil |
Characters =/= Games |
Sure
but you said Mass Effect 2 shouldn't have anything to worry about until
Round 4. Presumably you think Horizon can't challenge ME2? "Nothing I could do!" -Darksydephil |
LinkMarioSamus posted... Sure but you said Mass Effect 2 shouldn't have anything to worry about until Round 4. Presumably you think Horizon can't challenge ME2? I do not think it can beat ME2, no. |
huh I didn’t expect to be the only one on the side of BL2 this is where my great comeback begins! even though i’ve been wrong almost every time add the c and back away iphonesience |
transcience posted... huh I didn’t expect to be the only one on the side of BL2 You've taken the mantle from me! |
Yo weakest year that could beat 2017 who ya got. |
pjbasis posted... Yo weakest year that could beat 2017 who ya got. Where does it slot in if you assume it doubles 2011? All the stars in the sky are waiting for you. |
Mac Arrowny posted... Where does it slot in if you assume it doubles 2011? It would make it an easy 2nd place, but still way below 1998. |
Round 2 – Resident Evil 2 vs. DOOM Moltar’s Analysis Resident Evil 2 Round 1 – 83.13% vs. Danganronpa 2: Goodbye Despair DOOM Round 1 – 86.06% vs. INSIDE Oh boy, “My blowout is bigger than your blowout!” kind of match here. Don’t want to get tied up in overanalyzing which massive victory was more impressive too much, as both were really good! Like we’ve been saying, trying to measure based off fodder blowouts won’t always help. These two games look about even on paper. I think this match comes down to who cares more about which game, and I’m siding towards RE2. Like if I straight up just see this as RE vs Doom, more people care about Resident Evil here. Kind of like my thoughts on ME2 and Fallout 4, voters are going to fallback to whichever game/series resonates more with them. Based off contest history, that’s going to be Resident Evil, remake status be damned. (man today is either going to be really good for me of a complete wipeout) Moltar’s Bracket: Resident Evil 2 Moltar’s Prediction: Resident Evil 2 – 56% ____________________________________________________________________________ transience’s Analysis Okay, what's up with Doom? It had maybe the performance of the round, that or one of the Mario games. Personally, I think we're overreacting to blowing out fodder, but god knows that Doom did it better than anyone else did. I think it helps that 1.) Doom is extremely well known as a classic franchise, and 2.) it's just Doom, and could possibly pick up votes for OG Doom. Not many, of course, but a few here and there. This is the first real test of a remake. Remakes so far have faced Danganronpa, FTL and Night in the Woods. You can't really vote for those over a remake en masse! But Doom, that's another story. I'll be watching this result closely, and not because Doom went to town on Inside. If RE2 gets worked here, I'm not putting it on Doom's newfound strength, because honestly that doesn't align with the rest of the results or the reality of this website. I'll put it on RE2 being penalized for its remake status. RE2 is the most proven of the remakes since it won the 2019 GOTY, and yeah, I'm low on all of those games but at least it proved that it could beat a Fire Emblem game 1v1. I'm going to take RE2 kind of easily here. transience's prediction: Resident Evil 2 with 59.56% ____________________________________________________________________________ Leonhart’s Analysis Now this one is interesting. DOOM exceeded everyone’s expectations by getting 86% on INSIDE. It’s possible that INSIDE is just that weak, but it’s very difficult to put up 86% unless you’re decently strong. Still, Resident Evil 2 put up 83% on Danganronpa 2, which may not be all that popular overall, but I’d wager it’s stronger than INSIDE. However, I have been wondering if voters will hold the fact that Resident Evil 2 is a remake against it. It won’t matter against something like DR2, but against a game people actually like, I could see some voters taking it into account. Will that be enough to swing a match like this? Plus, I’ve kinda been skeptical of RE2’s strength to begin with. Three Houses’ unimpressive showing in round 1 just made me doubt it even more. I just wasn’t sure if there was anything strong enough in this half of the division to knock it off. I think DOOM demonstrated that it’s at least up to the task. I don’t know if it’ll actually win, but I like its chances enough that I’m going to roll with it. Leonhart’s Vote: Resident Evil 2 Leonhart’s Prediction: DOOM with 52.62% ____________________________________________________________________________ Kleenex’s Analysis The easiest match of the batch today, Resident Evil 2 is poised to stomp this entire division. DOOM looked really good last round, no doubt, but I think it had a lot of factors going in its favor that inflated its numbers a bit higher than it would normally get. Danganronpa isn’t exactly a world-beater either, but I feel really good about RE2 being able to take care of its business without too much trouble. Kleenex’s Prediction: Resident Evil 2 with 61.75% ____________________________________________________________________________ Guest’s Analysis – Sniperdog117 Hooray for round 2! Those matches were fun for me somehow, but I understand how they are not interesting for other people. I won’t mind a contest full of turbofodder though. Anyway, this is a debated match for what could maybe win division 2, so I guess that makes it important. Doom 2016 is one of those games I never thought would do good in a contest prior to its round 1 performance. It is one of my favorite games of the decade, but Doom and shooters are not that good here. (I guess Half-Life does ok…? Old Halo? Oh and the N64 ones, but that’s a given) Then again, I have seen a lot of round 1 matches where I thought GameFAQs would have no interest in an IP and was shocked to see that it turns out they have a fanbase here after all. And Doom 2016 is a lot different than the older ones in terms of contest relevance, so using old Doom related stats seems like a bad idea. And Doom is on the Switch! I heard the port was good too! Never played that version myself though. Thankfully we do have recent Doom data that is a lot more reliable, because round 1 happened. Duh. It went up against Inside in the caps locked match and almost had the blowout of the round with 86.06%. That’s a lot! And the day I saw it, I was really surprised Doom went that high. I did some research and Inside barely beat The Witness in a 2016 poll for indies. So Inside is super-weak. And we saw that in later matches, quite a lot of games put up very high percentages vs turbofodder. So that takes a way from Doom’s win a bit, but 86% has gotta mean something, at least to me. Its opponent, Resident Evil 2 (2019), also destroyed turbofodder, this time in the form of the VN Danganronpa 2. It was around 83%, so a bit lower than Doom’s percent. And I also would take Danganronpa 2 over Inside, as I feel like that game at least has a very small fanbase here on GameFAQs. And RE2 2019 won our GotY, that has to count for something… except for Sekiro and maaaaaybe FETH not looking too good makes 2019 look not too strong. Also, I am 100% sure that some people will refuse to vote for a remake of a 1990s game in the GotD for the 2010s, and that probably plays a bigger role in non-turbofodder matches. Also real quick, I want to bring up Journey vs Fate/GO. This is a weird match to bring up considering it has nothing to do with the two games in the match, but for some reason this made me rethink things. Journey broke 66.2% on Fate/GO. That’s like a hair away from a doubling. And while I think Journey is slightly stronger than it was in 2015, we know Journey is weak. And Inside is weaker. So if something as weak like Journey can nearly double something, that means Danganronpa 2 could break from uh… 55-60% on Inside. I dunno, seeing turbofodder beat down turbofodder by much has me thinking about this. One more thing… I feel like there’s at least some people who do not know Doom 2016 is a new title. Probably doesn’t matter though. Looking at all of this, I really do not think Doom can win, but I really want it to. Like I wanna see it get bandwagoned and beat ME2 for the division. That is how much I love the game. Maybe I am over rating Danganronpa 2? Never had a good read on VNs. So in conclusion RE2 2019 will probably win but everyone should play Doom 2016 (and Eternal, have not had the time to play it yet sadly) Resident Evil 2 (2019)- 49.99% Doom (2016)- 50.01% ____________________________________________________________________________ Crew Consensus: Second split of the day! Resident Evil 2 is the slight favorite in this match. Moltar Status: hype Contest Analysis Crew Archives: http://thecrew.speedrunwiki.com/ |
Man I love this division |
The Mana Sword posted... man what I have zero confidence in Doom, but love the game so much that I felt like I had to take it if there's even the smallest chance. Be really cool if it wins the division. Papaopamus? |
God that RE2 first round number puts into perspective how ridiculous BotW is. Not a stinky alien. :( Nintendo Switch Code: SW-5719-6555-8388 |
RE3 just came out, RE2 has to be a lock. If you wake up at a different time, in a different place, could you wake up as a different person? #theresafreakingghostafterus |
The Mana Sword posted... man whatFodder blowouts are difficult to glean info from, but DOOM did *so* well it deserves to be considered regardless. Black Turtle did a pretty good job. |
FFDragon posted... RE3 just came out, RE2 has to be a lock.RE3 has some mixed reception from what I've seen. Lots of arguments about it vs the original, and even casual folks seem disappointed over the removal of stuff like the clock tower. It probably won't affect RE2 much either way. You felt your sins weighing on your neck. (edited 4/12/2020 2:29:49 PM) |
FFDragon posted... RE3 just came out, RE2 has to be a lock. As did Doom Eternal. I think RE2 probably does have this one though, largely because Doom Eternal seems to generally be considered better than DOOM 2016, while RE3make is generally seen as worse than RE2make. So I think the recent outings make DOOM 2016 hold up slightly worse in hindsight and RE2 hold up slightly better in hindsight, if that makes sense. "Much like the pill bug, I too must continue to move forward." -Heropon Riki (paraphrased) |
Surely Doom > RE2 would be one of the biggest upsets of R2 I don't remember anyone entertaining that result precontest. I mean RE2 is considered the second most likely game to make it out of this division... If you're
only on this board to whine about "SJWs", please redirect whatever you
type on to the nearest trash can. And hop in after it. |
MechanicalWall posted... Surely Doom > RE2 would be one of the biggest upsets of R2 Honestly I think RE2 has this division on lock. Mass Effect 2 may be one of the best EA games, but it's still an EA game and EA has enough of a hatebase that anti-votes will tip the favor if it goes up against a heavy hitter like RE2. Fire Emblem Awakening has a hatebase of its own and is overshadowed by Three Houses. Bloodbourne seems like the most likely upset of the division to me, but after Sekiro's underwhelming performance I do wonder if soulsbourne games other than the original Dark Souls might be a bit overhyped in this contest. "Much like the pill bug, I too must continue to move forward." -Heropon Riki (paraphrased) |
FFDragon posted... RE3 just came out, RE2 has to be a lock. I'd imagine DOOM Eternal helps DOOM more than RE3 helps RE2. The Mana Sword posted... man what says the guy picking Fallout 4...! |
I told you guys, division 2 round 2 is crazy. 4/4 will be tough to come by. xyzzy |
Round 2 – Fire Emblem: Awakening vs. Bloodborne Moltar’s Analysis Fire Emblem: Awakening Round 1 – 62.76% vs. Deus Ex: Human Revolution Bloodborne Round 1 – 80.53% vs. Call of Duty: Black Ops Fire Emblem is not looking too hot (pun intended) in this contest. Both games had okay competition in Round 1, and neither looked great in their victories. Bloodborne on the other hand put up very impressive numbers on CoD. This looks to be one of those matches where the moniker ‘Game of the Decade’ might influence voters, because more people see Bloodborne as a GotD-type of game than a Fire Emblem game. The Souls games have all looked really good and partly I believe it’s due to that. I wouldn’t be surprised if it just runs away with this match and doesn’t look back. Moltar’s Bracket: Fire Emblem: Awakening Moltar’s Prediction: Bloodborne – 58% ____________________________________________________________________________ transience’s Analysis Wow, all four matches today are really good! This one comes down how legit Bloodborne is. Like Horizon, Bloodborne beat up on a game far outside our wheelhouse. It's good that it was well known enough to go big on it, but.. how good is it? It's hard to say. A lot of people got the sense that Fire Emblem disappointed, but Deus Ex has shown that it's not bad before. It pretty much lined up with where it belonged. That said, I do feel like Awakening has kinda fallen off with the release of Three Houses, which really took the mantle as the premiere game in the series. FE hung with Pokemon once upon a time, and a general rule of thumb is to trust in the Nintendo fanbase unless you have an overwhelming reason not to. Bloodborne might be one of those. It gets a lot of GOTD hype and I think I trust it. It's not because of the Call of Duty result either. I just think I trust a game with a real fanbase behind it over a 3DS Fire Emblem that didn't overwhelm last round. I'm the most interested to see this result, because Bloodborne could find a way to win the division if RE2 and ME2 underwhelm for reasons already discussed. transience's prediction: Bloodborne with 54.14% ____________________________________________________________________________ Leonhart’s Analysis When the bracket came out, I took Awakening here without thinking. I thought it looked better in 2015, and Fire Emblem’s stock had risen sufficiently lately because of the release of Three Houses. Then Awakening dropped a dud performance against a Deus Ex game, which did nothing to bolster my confidence in my bracket. I also wasn’t expecting all the Souls-type games to look so good, and I hadn’t considered that Bloodborne was still a brand-new game in 2015. It’s been free on PS+ within the last year or so, which probably helped expand its player base. I know Call of Duty isn’t what it was a decade ago, but the last time we saw a game unexpectedly drop 80% on a CoD game, Super Metroid went 60/40 on Super Mario Galaxy in round 2. Now I’m not saying Bloodborne is going to do that to Awakening, but I’m also not saying it can’t! I’ll be rooting for my bracket, but I’m picking against it two matches in a row here. Leonhart’s Vote: Fire Emblem: Awakening Leonhart’s Prediction: Bloodborne with 59.59% ____________________________________________________________________________ Kleenex’s Analysis I sound like a broken record here, but I’m a little unconvinced of Bloodborne’s strength. It looked very good last round, but against a Call of Duty game that doesn’t mean a ton. Fire Emblem, on the other hand, actually appeared disappointing to me. I can’t imagine Deus Ex is worth all that much, and that’s not a very impressive result in my mind. Barring some weird Nintendo shit happening, Bloodborne should be good. Unless it just got massively overrated against a very weak game, but the margin still seems too large even if that ends up being the case. Kleenex’s Prediction: Bloodborne with 57.75% ____________________________________________________________________________ Guest’s Analysis – MechanicalWall Oh boy. This is one of the very few contentious matches where I disregarded my own opinion (BB > FE) and went with what most B8ers were telling me (FE > BB cause of x-stats and lol From sucks on GFaqs). Do I regret that yet?? ... kinda. Let's start on the BB side 'cause it's simple. It performed like a 2 seed ought to and took out the trash with a solid quadrupling. Yes we can quibble about how CoD attracts anti-votes and blah blah blah, but this was almost the same exact percentage (a bit higher, actually) that Super Metroid put on MW1 in 2015. Yes, 2020 Blops is gonna be noticeably weaker than 2015 MW1, but Bloodborne doesn't need to be Super Metroid to win this match. Add that to the fact that FROM's games have been performing pretty well so far (outside of Sekiro, but without going on too long of a ramble, I could have told you pre-contest that Sekiro was going to be significantly weaker than DkS and BB) and it seems everything is lining up for Bloodborne to win this match. Meanwhile, Fire Emblem couldn't even come that close to doubling Deus Ex Human Revolution. Is that bad? Well, the final percentage of this match was about what FE should have scored on the OG DE according to lol x-stats. So the question now is, is HR stronger or weaker than the OG? I actually think there's some reason to believe it's stronger. The original game is widely regarded as a classic, a milestone, one of the greatest games of all time... by PC gamers. It never got a GOOD home console release, and it's pretty damn difficult to get into if you're a lifelong console player. It's, for lack of a better term, a PC-ass PC game, and we don't do that shit here. Human Revolution never got the same amount of acclaim, but it's still very well-regarded, and more importantly, had a console release (and the crucial Nintendo port onto... uh, the Wii U). The game was also considerably dumbed down to be able to be played with a controller. From both the release and gameplay standpoints, it's much, MUCH more accessible than the original game. Adam Jensen also did better than Yu Narukami against Vivi, so there's that...for whatever that's worth. The argument that DE>HR is, well, that the original is regarded as a classic, a milestone, it's not winning by enough blah blah blah. I dunno, I shilled pretty hard for Fire Emblem as a series but both Awakening and Three Houses put on pretty mediocre performances. Their opponents might have been stronger than we thought because they're both contest newcomers with little data to work with but ehhh. It doesn't really make sense, Three Houses has been a hit and generated a LOT of buzz around the franchise. As a series, it has every reason to be stronger than in 2015. Smash players can't be THAT salty about Byleth... Can Fire Emblem win? Yah, it's not hard to believe at all. All you have to believe is that Blops is SIGNIFICANTLY weaker than MW1, and that HR is at least equal to the original. Are those two things impossible? No, they're actually decently likely. You know what? Forget it. Writing all this has convinced me Awakening can take it here, so I'm just gonna roll with my bracket pick and hope for the best. Along with HK vs FFXV and P4 vs RDR, this is by far the most interesting match of Round 2 for me... MechanicalWall prediction: Fire Emblem Awakening – 52% ____________________________________________________________________________ Crew Consensus: No unanimous consensuses today as our Guest is siding with FE. Moltar Status: hype Contest Analysis Crew Archives: http://thecrew.speedrunwiki.com/ |
whoa! I thought my Bloodborne pick would be more unusual than my Borderlands one. I can't even predict the crew this year! xyzzy |
heck yeah split Crew for every match |
After
all the hand wringing l saw in the discussion thread over these games'
R1 performances, I did NOT expect to be the only one taking Fire Emblem
here. I started writing with the end conclusion of 'Bloodborne wins' but the more I wrote the more I realized that based on my logic, Fire Emblem had a real chance If
you're only on this board to whine about "SJWs", please redirect
whatever you type on to the nearest trash can. And hop in after it. |
Dragon Quest has bled a bit of percentage. Seems like it'll be a close one between me and Kleenex. |
This
is definitely the most fun set of writeups yet! But don't worry -
whatever happens in a couple of hours goons will be lining up to say it
was all obvious from the start. We are living our lives Abound with so much information |
I'll say it now then: ME2 vs. Fallout: Obvious win for ME2. Mass Effect 2 is still considered a top tier western RPG even now. No one has that kind of respect for Fallout 4. BL2 vs. Horizon: Not obvious. Either or both games could be fraudulent. No way to accurately judge their relative strengths. RE2 vs. DOOM: Obvious win for RE2. Doom would have to overcome 90s nostalgia, anti-FPS sentiment, respect for an actually good remake, and the fact that the RE3 remake literally just came out (look at what that's doing for FF15!) FEA vs. Bloodborne: Obvious win for Bloodborne. Handheld games are really bad. Deus Ex is really bad. Bloodborne looked really good. Goon out. |
Did I think too hard for my write-up? FE vs Bloodborne is the only non-obvious result for me here, I think ME2 Horizon and RE2 are pretty decent locks to win their matches If
you're only on this board to whine about "SJWs", please redirect
whatever you type on to the nearest trash can. And hop in after it. |
The thing is, we don't know what FFVIIR is doing for FFXV. We have no measurable standard to judge it against otherwise. (edited 4/12/2020 5:48:48 PM) |
I'm
shocked at how many people are still backing RE. I still think between
Doom's round 1 shellacking of INSIDE and the fact that SmartVoterFAQs
will drop the REmake in lieu of a game that actually came out this
decade, seems like a pretty clear win for DOOM "Like Darth Maul, the bastard child of Michael Flatley and hellboy" - trancer1 lol xstats |
I immediately regret my pick |
Counterpoints:
Resident Evil shellacked Danganronpa, and it's a remake that is (from
what I've heard anyway) different enough that it feels like a game of
this decade. It doesn't even need an RE3 boost that may or may not exist, but it's the kind of factor that could push it over the top in a close match, which is exactly what FF15 is in right now. (edited 4/12/2020 6:08:57 PM) |
Yeah
but will people actually treat it like a game that belongs to this
decade? Against DR2, it doesn't matter, but against an actual well liked
game, we shall see. I think RE2 should still be the favorite, but I decided to take a risk. |
Original
RE2 isn't exactly a powerhouse. If you're taking RE2 2019 to win this
division it's with the assumption that it's as strong or stronger than
the original. Black Turtle did a pretty good job. |
Doom's in my bracket so I totally get taking the risk. I've just abandoned it after RE2 looked so good in round 1. Bloodborne will win the division though*. *not an obvious result. subject to change |
i
think 3 games have a realistic shot at the round: ME2, RE2 and
Bloodborne. Bloodborne is way more of a wildcard. Fallout 4 could maybe
join that group but I’m in a wait and see mode with it. add the c and back away iphonesience |
LOL Fallout 4 |
well we all make mistakes |
ME2/RE2 division finals looks good at this point |
wow, is that some WRPG SFF or what? there's no way Fallout 4 loses to RE7. I might go 4/4 today which will be a miracle xyzzy |
transience posted... wow, is that some WRPG SFF or what? there's no way Fallout 4 loses to RE7. It could be! But how weak is VVVVVV? If it's down there with something like VLR, then FO4 wouldn't even be that much stronger than Diablo III |
transience posted... there's no way Fallout 4 loses to RE7. or does it? If you wake up at a different time, in a different place, could you wake up as a different person? #theresafreakingghostafterus |
VVVVVV isn't that weak. if it ends up below inside or something crazy like that then something very wrong has happened. xyzzy |
if Fallout 4 loses to RE7 then New Vegas is going to get annihilated by God of War, and probably not even make it there xyzzy |
transience posted... if Fallout 4 loses to RE7 then New Vegas is going to get annihilated by God of War, and probably not even make it there Eh, I think people just don't like FO4 that much. But it already cut off 3% there. Its board vote is truly horrendous. |
Topic Sticky
Update Topic Flair
- Master Moltar (38)
- Board List
- Topic List
- Track Topic
- Topic Closed